You're committing serious budget to construction AI on the strength of vendor demos. Blocks runs the bake-off instead: every vendor's agent works the identical synthetic project in your jurisdiction, graded by deterministic code, compared cell for cell.
Choose an independent referee. Not a vendor's demo, not an internal guess.
A structured, deadline-bounded engagement your team drives from a dedicated console, with Blocks refereeing the parts that must stay independent.
Pick the areas that match how you'll deploy: payment clocks, lien & retainage, information boundaries, record reconciliation, as-of discipline, directed actions, plus the jurisdiction and project profile. "Texas payment and lien law, statute-cited" is a selection, not a promise.
Each vendor receives a time-bounded credential for its own lane and an ungraded sandbox task that proves its integration connects before anything graded counts. Nobody's score suffers for a broken pipe.
Live per-vendor completion and refused-attempt counts as agents work the matrix. Interim scores stay sealed until close, for everyone including you: a mid-flight leaderboard invites mid-flight tuning and pressure to end early.
A comparative report over the shared matrix, beside a scripted reference floor, with completion shown as a column. A partial submission is shown as partial, never quietly averaged. Each vendor sees only its own findings summary. The room is yours alone.
Vendor decks don't answer "who signed off, and what did they ask to see?" A scored, checkable comparison does. The report is written for the third forward, in construction language, not benchmark jargon, so your risk officer, your GC counsel, and your CIO can all read it cold.
The environment is deterministic: the same assessment replays to the identical project record and the identical score. An auditor can ask for the rerun and get the same number.
No model judges another model. Scoring is ordinary deterministic code, and the grading method is open to review by your assurance team under NDA.
Jurisdiction profiles are researched against primary sources, independently re-verified, and given a final sign-off before they back any assessment. "How do you know your answer key is right?" has a written answer.
Graded work runs on held-out project instances. A different instance is a different world, so memorizing public examples doesn't transfer. Knowing the rule does.
Every document a vendor receives carries its own results only, with no rank and no view of the field, and the cross-vendor comparison is refused to a vendor credential outright. Below the documents, each vendor's credential is bound to its own agent and reads only the records that agent produced, so a competitor's scores and transcripts return nothing. Each bake-off also runs in its own tenant, the outer boundary.
Nothing from your record, your subcontractors, or your platform is used or needed. There is no data-sharing agreement to negotiate before the engagement can start.
A comparison only means something if the parties being compared accept the process. Blocks is built so a vendor's reasonable objections have real answers.
Book a demo and we'll walk your team through a live engagement, end to end, on a synthetic project in your jurisdiction.
Book a demo